|
“We all have the ability.
The difference is how we use it.“ –- German Proverb
With a mix of excitement and apprehension, the three of us rejected our job
offers in corporate America. We were officially full-time "entrepreneurs." We also hired
another employee to replace us as manager of the QuakerCard. If we were serious about expanding our business,
we felt it was important to remove
ourselves from the daily operations on Penn’s campus. After all, if we were
going to run campus programs at multiple universities, we couldn’t personally
manage every one by ourselves.
Although we were excited about expanding to other schools, we harbored some ill
will with the Business Services people at Penn. As a result, we continued
to market our program aggressively on Penn’s campus.
In our view, Penn was the 500-lb. gorilla and we were the underdog fighting for survival. That meant using
every marketing nuance to our advantage, including the names QuakerCard and
University Student Services, and our on-campus location. In our second mailing
campaign during the summer of 1997, excerpts from the cover letter follow:
“Dear Penn Student and Parents,
We’ve been working hard to make QuakerCard an even better service for you this
year! The QuakerCard is a meal plan and necessity account created
specifically for students at the University of Pennsylvania … In its most basic
form, the program offers a better quality and more flexible dining plan for
students, so they can eat their meals at local restaurants near campus.
In an attempt to provide for the safety of our students, the QuakerCard can also
be used to pay for Yellow Cab taxis, so that students never have to worry about
walking home alone, late at night.”
On the back of the letter, we had a map of Penn’s campus, showing where each of
our merchants was located. It literally covered the entire map. We labeled the
map, “Home of the QuakerCard.” Beneath it was a list of each restaurant, its
description, and any discounts that it offered on the card.
If Penn’s Business Services were mad at us the prior year, they were going to be
furious with us now, because we marketed QuakerCard as if it was more important as
the school-offered services. We even referred to cardholders as being “our
students.” The only distinction we made between QuakerCard and the school was a
disclaimer on the bottom that read “Affiliated with students, not the
University.” At that point, we didn’t care about playing nice. The Business
Services people had become the enemy.
In our new marketing campaign, we touted the card’s new features. The QuakerCard
had also become a discount card, offering up to 20% savings at restaurants
and other places around campus. We even came up with automated deposit
authorization, where funds could be deposited from a parent’s credit card or
checking account periodically into the student’s QuakerCard account.
In our second year of operations, QuakerCard had higher deposits than the prior
year (over $2 million in aggregate spending on the program), and we successfully
captured over 70% of the entire freshmen class as card-carrying members. Despite
our more aggressive marketing stance, we received no further push back from the school
and we were more popular than ever with the student body. Unfortunately, success
reinforced our “we’ll show them” attitude. It appeared we were
winning the war at Penn and the end seemed to justify the means.
|
 |
Copyright 2005 by Chris Cononico
All rights reserved. No part of this manuscript may be reproduced in any
form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information
storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the
author, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review.
|