|
As we put the finishing touches on our
business plan, the school newspaper, The Daily Pennsylvanian, featured a cover
story about a group of Penn students planning to start an off-campus debit card
program dubbed "College Cash." I was shocked because the article wasn’t talking
about us. The article also mentioned how the University was contemplating its
own debit card program on the back of the PennCard, Penn's student
identification card.
Suddenly, QuakerCard was faced with two possible competitors, College Cash and
Penn. Both planned to offer debit cards emphasizing the safety of a “cashless
society.” Both also planned to promote the fiscal responsibility of debt cards,
because students could only spend their existing balances and not fall into
debt.
While there was nothing innovative about what Penn or College Cash were
offering, both planned to market their programs as being “customized” to meet
student needs. In reality, generic debit cards were already offered by scores of
local banks. On the contrary, QuakerCard planned to restrict its merchant base
to restaurants only. Therefore, parents could fund QuakerCard and know the money
could be used only for food purchases. Ironically, limiting the card usage was a
way for parents to ensure students always had enough money to eat. In effect, it
was designed to mimic an off-campus cafeteria program.
We were confident about competing with another student business, but we knew it
was risky to compete with Penn. The school’s “Business Services” department had
a virtual monopoly over its students, a near limitless budget, and a powerful
brand. That’s why the University could offer a service and get 90%
participation; meanwhile a private company could offer the same service and only
get a 1% response rate. Clearly, it was in our best interest to convince Penn to
work with us.
In order to explore the idea of a possible partnership, I went to the office of
Larry Cotter, who helped manage the PennCard. I simply knocked on his door and
asked to discuss the recent article in the school newspaper. He agreed with a
slight hesitation, and awkwardly asked me if I worked with College Cash. His
demeanor surprised me and my instincts told me if I had said “yes,” he never
would have spoken to me.
Since Larry already mentioned College Cash, I casually asked if he would
consider working with a student company. His answer was a resounding, “No!” His
team had been researching debit card systems for years. They planned to put the
system out to bid to large financial institutions like PNC Bank. Apparently,
these companies would pay big bucks to sell their financial services to
students.
Trying to understand Larry's strategy, I asked if the PennCard could ever become
a restaurant meal plan. Not only did Larry have no intention of marketing a
restricted card, but he also believed such a “discriminatory” policy would
create too much protest in the merchant community. Instead, Larry preferred to
offer a generic debit card, so every merchant would be able to participate. The
PennCard was going to be accepted wherever VISA or Master Card was accepted.
It was apparent to me that Larry and I disagreed on the type of product students
wanted. It also meant there was a chance for QuakerCard to carve out a niche for
itself. Larry and I continued to talk and he even showed me a prototype of the
new PennCard with an embedded smart card chip. As I left his office, he shook my
hand and told me to call him if I had any more questions. I never did call him
back.
The information I gleaned from my meeting with Larry was mixed at best. Although
it was encouraging to hear that Penn wasn’t planning to market an off-campus
meal plan, it sounded like the school would never work with us. If we proceeded
with our business, we would be competing directly with the "Business Services"
department of the University.
The school’s Business Services group was the department that provides commercial
services to the local community. Besides education, colleges also address other
consumer demands such as cafeteria programs, licensing arrangements, real estate
development, phone services, and more. Unlike the educational side of the
school, Business Services operated like a “for profit” department beneath the
non-for-profit umbrella.
With such a dreary competitive outlook, you would think we stamped our business
plan a “no go” and chalked the whole thing up to a very informative class
project, but we didn’t. As daunting as the odds seemed, we hoped our idea was
sufficiently unique from that of our competition. It was a risky gamble, because
someone like Larry could take out a piece of University stationary, and write a
letter to parents and students recommending that everyone avoid our services. He
could run us out of business pretty quickly.
However, the four of us were still students, so we felt we had little to lose.
If the company failed, we’d be no worse off. On the other hand, if it worked, we
could become “successful” entrepreneurs. After all, the 11.8% fee had seemed
like an insurmountable obstacle, but we made it work. We wondered if having the
courage to take the initial leap of faith might be the secret ingredient to
entrepreneurial success.
|
 |
Copyright 2005 by Chris Cononico
All rights reserved. No part of this manuscript may be reproduced in any
form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information
storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the
author, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review.
|