Based
on their analysis, the group believed there was strong demand
from students for the idea. Unlike the school cafeteria, the
Bullfrog Card was available 24/7 and there were no missed
meals. If a student didn’t spend his cash balance on the card,
he got a full refund. With such obvious benefits, the idea’s
success largely depended on how well Johnny and his group
delivered their marketing message. They envisioned the Bullfrog
Card as an “alternative meal plan,” not as a generic debit card.
From their perspective, the idea just happened to use debit
card technology to link restaurants together, but that wasn’t
the value the idea offered.
The
school cafeteria required students to prepay for the semester
for a designated number of weekly meals. Therefore, if a student
missed a meal, he was still charged for it. The school didn't
offer refunds and unused meals didn’t accumulate for later use.
Most students missed several meals per week, so the money was
wasted. By using Bullfrog Card, students would be able to eat
whenever they wanted, and any unused balance would be refunded
back to them.
The
first step in positioning the Bullfrog Card as a viable
alternative to the cafeteria was offering suggested “deposit
amounts,” so students could sign up for fully-refundable “meal
plans.” They hoped parents would gladly fund the account,
because it was only for food purchases. It was also a way to
help students budget their dining expenses.
The
breakdown of their meal plans was as follows:
|
Plan type |
Description |
Suggested deposit |
|
Plan 1 |
Our “safety plans” just for emergencies and added
convenience. |
$100 |
|
Plan 2 |
For those occasional snackers and “once-a-weekers.” |
$325 |
|
Plan 3 |
A
good plan for weekend warriors. |
$550 |
|
Plan 4 |
Perfect for weekend meals, study breaks, and occasional
snacks. |
$995 |
|
Plan 5 |
The right choice for daily dinner without the cafeteria
plan. |
$1,550 |
|
Plan 6 |
Ultimate in safety and convenience! Never need cash…ever! |
$1,950 |
In their sample brochures,
they showed that by eating at local restaurants students benefited
from more variety, and it cost them less money than did the
cafeteria plan. In addition, the cafeteria wasn’t open on the
weekends. This left a void that the Bullfrog Card could easily
fill. After all, students were going to be eating at the
restaurants anyway, so this was a way for their parents to pay for
the meals. It was especially appealing to freshmen parents, who
wanted to know their students had enough money set aside for food,
and any deposits would be used exclusively for that purpose.
The importance of achieving
a high penetration rate with the freshmen class was enormous. Each
student represented a potential four-year customer. It was because
of the freshmen class that they came up with the idea of the
“safety” and “snack” plans. They wanted to give freshmen parents a
reason to try our program. Once a student used the Bullfrog Card,
they were confident he would be hooked.
The four group members
began to think ahead, and explore their personal contacts. Abe’s
girlfriend’s father was an attorney. He offered to draw up their
merchant contracts and customer agreements for free. Joe’s mother
was a CPA, and she offered to assist them with their accounting
system. She also suggested that her firm hold the deposits in trust
for cardholders, in case people were wary about sending money to a
student-run company.
Soon, the business plan was
finished. The mission statement was simple: “To honorably serve the
needs of the University community by providing a quality dining
alternative, linking students to restaurants, while promoting
safety.” By the end of the semester, Johnny, Maverock, Abe, and Joe
were proud of their work. They believed the Bullfrog Card was a
viable business opportunity.

Copyright 2005 by Chris
Cononico
All rights reserved. No part of this manuscript may be reproduced in any
form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information
storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the
author, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review. |